top of page

Washington Unemployment Eligibility Checker Re-Design

Deliverables

Final, high-fidelity mobile and web prototypes

Context

Class project

Digitizing, simplifying, and improving the user experience of the Washington Unemployment Eligibility Checker

Collaborators

4 other students

My role

User Research Coordinator

UX Designer (mobile)

home.png
assessment.png
BeginAssessment.png
Overview

Overview

Problem

​

The current unemployment site and eligibility form are proven to cause Washingtonians, who are trying to determine whether they are eligible for unemployment benefits, to feel overwhelmed, stressed, and confused.

​

Goal

Our primary assignment was to digitize the Washington State Unemployment Eligibility Checker PDF. We also sought to simplify and improve the form to streamline unemployment benefits and create a more positive user experience.

 

​

Outcome

​

We created an interactive, "assessment-like" eligibility checker that allows users to determine, with significant certainty, their unemployment eligibility status. 

​

As Research Coordinator,  I designed user research and usability testing sessions. In these sessions, I sought to determine our users' needs and translate them into design requirements. I was also the lead designer of the high-fidelity mobile prototype, in which I satisfied these design requirements through simple, user-friendly design.

For every 10 people who successfully filed unemployment claims in Washington, 3 to 4 people were unable to register and another 2 people gave up trying to apply.

 

​8.9 million to 13.9 million people have been shut out of the system.

​

​​

​​

Sources: BBC, reuters

Original Eligibility Checker

UIEligibilityChecker.jpg
UIEligibilityChecker2.jpg
Final Design

Final Design

My Movie 10

Process

Research
Define
Ideate
Prototype
Test
User Research

User Research

We recruited 4 participants who had been unemployed in Washington State sometime in the last year for in-depth user interviews. We asked our participants to walk us through the process they had taken to apply for unemployment benefits. We sought to understand the emotions they felt during the process.

 

Did they use the unemployment eligibility checker when determining whether they were eligible for benefits? If so, was the PDF useful? If they hadn't seen it before, we asked them about their reaction to the eligibility checker.

Insights

Unresponsive website

Process is long and strenuous

Unclear feedback about eligibility

Emotional Distress

Poor website accessibility

No resources for support

Empathy Map

EmpathyMap.jpg

User Personas

Fresh

MARKET

Sarah.jpg

Problem Statement

The current unemployment site and eligibility form cause applicants to feel stress and uncertainty about their eligibility status.

How might we  create a positive user experience that allows users to determine, with significant certainty, whether they are eligible for unemployment benefits?

Ideation

Storyboard

How might an ideal interaction with the digital unemployment checker go?

storyboard.jpg

user becomes unemployed

user is stressed/anxious

user searches for unemployment options and finds WA unemployment site

user begins eligibility assessment

creates profile to receive updates 

 user consults the chat bot about confusing terminology

finishes assessment -they are eligible! Applies for benefits on the official  site

user can spend time with their loved ones

Prototyping

Low-fidelity  Wireframes

We created 2 versions to test with users:

​

1. Clickable Checklist

2. "Assessment"-like Checker

Clickable checklist

After creating an account, the user fills out the checklist and receives an estimate of their eligibility status and benefit amount.

Screen Shot 2021-01-29 at 8.56.46 AM.png

A Closer Look

Screen Shot 2020-12-17 at 2.59.34 PM.png

Assessment-style 

The user traverses the assessment one question at a time, only answering questions that apply to them.

Screen Shot 2021-01-29 at 8.57.38 AM.png

A Closer Look

Screen Shot 2020-12-14 at 4.45.56 PM.png
Testing

Concept Testing

We tested each low-fidelity prototype with 5 users. 

Questions:

  • Would users rather use a clickable checklist or a question-by-question assessment?

  • Which design is more intuitive? 

  • Are any of the questions still confusing?

  • Do users clearly know when to answer "yes" or "no"?

  • Do users know where to click on each wireframe and do they have an accurate idea of what will be accomplished if they do so? 

Results

Overwhelmingly,  users preferred the "assessment-style" interface.

Iteration

Iteration

While users enjoyed the concept of the assessment-style eligibility checker, they wanted more clarity - some terminology was still confusing, and the order of the questions was confusing. Users only want to traverse the questions that are relevant to them based on their previous answers (i.e. COVID-19 related questions, questions about being laid off, etc.)

Eligibility Assessment User Flow

We mapped out the different journeys users could take through the assessment that would get them to an answer in the most efficient way possible. Thus, creating a "reactive" assessment that changes course depending on each answer. 

Flow diagram.jpg

High Fidelity Prototype

Style Guide

Typography (2).png
Colors (5).png

Final Design

My Movie 10
Reflection

What I've Learned

I solidified my technical skills in Figma, Miro, and Balsamiq.

​

I learned how greatly a product's user experience can affect peoples' mental health and wellbeing.

​

I learned how to translate users' feelings and emotions into design requirements.

​

bottom of page